Ancient Hindu Temple With Thousand Pillars(Difficult Antiquated Technology Discovered) 


Hello guys, today we will take a gander at one of the most peculiar old locales in India - this is the Hindu Temple having Thousand Pillars. This very temple is at around 750 years of old.

On first sight, it would seem that a customary sanctuary, be that as it may, there is something on a very basic level extraordinary about this sanctuary, in light of the fact that there are no obvious joints at all between the stone squares in the dividers of this sanctuary.

This is a vast sanctuary, yet look cautiously as I go starting from the earliest stage the best, do you see any joints?

This makes individuals think about whether this whole sanctuary is made of one strong shake, similar to the Kailasa Sanctuary, however, archaeologists affirm that it is in certainty made of numerous squares of stone.

In 1300 A.D, a multitude of the Muslim Sultan Allauddin Khalji attempted to decimate this sanctuary, and they took out a large number of the stone squares from the ground and the roof, since it was less demanding to disassemble them, however, they proved unable to destroy the squares on the dividers.

In the event that you take a gander at the floor, these are more up to date stone chunks set by the Archaeology office, what's more, you can perceive how these squares are freely associated.

In the event that you think about the cutting edge stone brickwork with the old strategy, present-day innovation shows up very crude, since you can unmistakably see the joints. The paleontology office has been attempting to reestablish the sanctuary from the devastation what's more, spray painting by Allauddin Khalji's Army.


Presently, for what reason is this sanctuary called 'The thousand column sanctuary'? Most guests ask why this is known as the thousand column sanctuary since it doesn't have a thousand columns. It is called so on the grounds that it is made of one thousand squares of stone, this is the real motivation behind why this name is utilized.

However, even in most complex sanctuaries like the Lepakshi sanctuary, we can see clear proof of joints between the squares, however, in this sanctuary, the joints are not noticeable. Is entrancing that there was no bond, mortar, or paste used to join these squares.

How did old developers accomplish such an exceptional dimension of jointing, numerous hundreds of years prior? What sort of innovation existed and how was such a sanctuary manufactured?

The basic innovation is this: Ancient manufacturers made a perplexing interlocking framework with somewhere around twelve distinct cuts in each stone square. These perplexing cuts amplify the measure of surface territory shared by the associating squares, furthermore, will make a to a great degree tight fit. This is sufficiently hard to do between 2 stone squares, yet envision utilizing a few stone squares on all sides and what number of cuts would have been expected to interface 4 or 5 squares together.

That is to say, this is only an uncommon innovation. This should be possible on wood, yet how did they figure out how to make these cuts on vast stone squares numerous hundreds of years prior? Making these cuts is a certain something, however, the dimension of exactness, to make these joints undetectable can be accomplished just with cutting-edge machines.

We can plainly observe that building a monstrous Hindu temple with no obvious joints is unthinkable with crude apparatuses. Did antiquated developers utilize cutting, boring also, cleaning apparatuses, much the same as today?

Provided that this is true, do we have any proof of these apparatuses in the sanctuary itself What about these carvings which look like a present-day boring and cleaning devices? In many sanctuaries, we, for the most part, observe carvings of Divine beings, however, in this sanctuary, we can see these devices like carvings, with a funnel-shaped, striated top with a long shaft, which is amazingly like cutting-edge device bits.

Simply contrast these carvings and the present apparatus bits one next to the other. You need to concede there is an uncanny likeness. Is this a fortuitous event, or did antiquated developers use device bits simply like us, to make these exact interlocking framework?

The columns in the sanctuary affirm that penetrating machines were in certainty utilized. There are extremely modest openings penetrated on these columns. My companion is attempting to send a string through the little openings, however, these gaps are excessively little notwithstanding for a string.

The minister is cheerful to encourage us, he gets an option that is more slender than a string and embeds it effectively through these gaps. In the event that you think these carvings are not boring bits, how would you clarify such small openings cut on the columns?

How would you clarify the development of a whole sanctuary with no noticeable joints? Were they made with cutting-edge machines, or on the other hand with basic instruments like etches and mallets? If it's not too much trouble telling me your considerations in the remarks area.

If you like it,  please comment below and It's my earnest request if you know more about this Hindu temple kindly intimate me.